Current Use of Fractional Flow Reserve: A Nationwide Survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Current status of assessment of fractional flow reserve.
oronary angiography presently remains the main method for the diagnosis and instruction of epicardial coronary disease. However, precise characterization of the significance for any given stenosis is limited by the inability to identify intermediate coronary lesions responsible for ischemia. In clinical practice, in addition to the assessment of the anatomical details of vessel narrowing, a mor...
متن کاملFractional Flow Reserve
Traditionally, coronary artery disease was assessed using coronary angiographic guidance. Significant lesions were determined by the coronary angiographer. However, interobserver variability showed a significant limitation of interpretation of coronary angiography. Stent deployment and apposition were also evaluated based on angiographic appearance only. Risk factors for stent thrombosis and in...
متن کاملClinical use of optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve.
INTRODUCTION The aim of each diagnostic method is to serve as a guide in deciding about the right patient treatment. During myocardial revascularization the decision to perform revascularization is usually not easy to make, especially in case of borderline stenosis. It has been proven that it is not enough to base morphological evaluation of coronary artery vessel stenosis solely on angiography...
متن کامل“Virtual” (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve
Ma Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the “gold standard” for assessing the physiological significance of coronary artery disease during invasive coronary angiography. FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention improves patient outcomes and reduces stent insertion and cost; yet, due to several practical and operator related factors, it is used in <10% of percutaneous coronary intervention proc...
متن کاملFractional flow reserve-guided PCI.
n engl j med 372;1 nejm.org january 1, 2015 94 difference. The observed loss of FEV1 was neither a time-dependent nor a dose-dependent effect in the withdrawal group, as compared with the maintenance group. A difference of 38 ml between groups became apparent only after the final step of inhaled glucocorticoid withdrawal and did not change to a meaningful extent thereafter. Singanayagam et al. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Texas Heart Institute Journal
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0730-2347,1526-6702
DOI: 10.14503/thij-13-3917